Covid-19 [5]
A World War 2 Trilogy - By FRED NATH (Novelist and Neurosurgeon)
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Posts

Covid-19 [5]
Covid-19 [4] The NHS
Covid-19 [4]
Covid-19 [4]
Covid-19 [3]

Most Popular Posts

Fred's Doc Blog
The Trial by Franz Kafka -my personal view.
Dr Bawa-Garba and Manslaughter
How to self-publish your book (Episode 1) - a Quick, Easy Solution!
Trigeminal Neuralgia


Medical stuff


May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
July 2019
June 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
December 2016
September 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
January 2016
November 2015
August 2015
March 2014
January 2014
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010

powered by

Fred's Blog

Covid-19 [5]

I wrote in a previous post about Koch’s postulates. To recap, whether you get an infection or not, depends on 3 things:

1.       Host vulnerability – if you are immunocompromised (for example)
2.      Virulence of the organism – if you get Ebola as opposed to a mild cold
3.      Dose of organism – if you have a huge dose of an innocuous infective organism you are more likely to become ill than if it is only 1 bacterium or virus.

With the Corona virus we know that certain individuals are more prone to both catch the disease and to die from it. We do know that people of BAME groups are more likely to be affected and so are front line NHS workers. There is much consternation over this, but applying the above, there may be some answers. It is improbable that it is postulate 1 or 2 above that results in the increased incidence and death rate, although clearly older individuals are more likely to die if they get the respiratory distress and since they have more ACE 2 receptors, they will get a bigger viral load.

Since front line workers are not only more likely to get the virus and more likely to die from it, it seems logical to assume that the problem is dose of virus. They are exposed to far more virus than the average person out for a walk 2 meters away. The droplets hang around in the air in a still atmosphere for hours so exposure to that environment makes it more likely that the dose of virus is high where the PPE mask (for example) didn’t fit properly or the virus gets in through the eyes under the visor.

The much-maligned Marseilles study showed that in people who were mildly infected, they cleared the virus quickly and it was assumed to be the drugs responsible. I make no judgement on that, but I suspect the real significance was that the ones who went on to develop the late respiratory distress syndrome probably had such large doses of virus that they overloaded their immune system and developed the auto-immune ARDS.

There are numerous studies which show that using acoustic rhinometry, the size of the nasal cavity varies with ethnicity and that Caucasians have smaller nasal cavities than other racial groups. Asian people are in-between in nasal cavity size. The proportionate difference is very similar to the racial differential mortality with Covid-19. I think this may be important because in a large nasal cavity, the infection will cause a greater viral load, leading to a greater likelihood of the late development of the respiratory distress and organ failure.

All this leads me to conclude that the size of the viral load is the important factor in the development of the severe acute respiratory distress. The people with mild illness had a smaller dose and cleared the virus quicker.

Just sayin’ is all.

0 Comments to Covid-19 [5]:

Comments RSS

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment